What Brands Should Actually Do About Agentic Commerce in the Next 90 Days

I attended Azoma’s Agentic Commerce, Decoded conference expecting a big-picture AI conversation, but the strongest takeaway was much more practical: most brands already know what to fix first.

There is no shortage of commentary right now on AI shopping, agentic commerce, and the future of discovery. What is harder to find is a useful answer to a simpler question: what should a brand actually do next?

After attending Azoma’s conference, my view is that the answer is less complicated than many teams think.

The conversation across the event kept coming back to the same point. This is not mainly a story about chasing the newest tool. It is a story about fixing fundamentals that now matter more because AI systems are part of the path to purchase.

For brands trying to decide where to start, here is the short version.

1. Audit your product and brand data before you do anything else

This was probably the least flashy point raised all afternoon, which is exactly why it matters. If your product data is incomplete, inconsistent, or weak across systems, AI tools will not trust it. Multiple speakers described clean data as the prerequisite for everything else.

That means checking the basics with real discipline:

  • product titles
  • attributes
  • descriptions
  • packaging details
  • taxonomy
  • claims
  • content consistency across retailers and brand-owned channels

If your data is sloppy, no amount of AI hype is going to save you.

Slide titled "Audit Your Product & Brand Data" under the heading "E-Commerce AI Readiness." The slide explains that clean, consistent product and brand data is essential for AI visibility. A large feature panel states, "Clean, consistent product and brand data is the prerequisite for AI visibility." Six supporting areas are highlighted in individual cards: Product Titles (clear, specific, consistently formatted), Attributes (structured and complete), Descriptions (useful and aligned), Packaging Details (dimensions, materials, variants, and pack counts), Taxonomy & Claims (proper categorization and accurate claims), and Content Consistency (alignment across retailers and brand-owned channels). The design features a dark background with a blue-green-purple gradient headline and minimalist line icons.

2. Stop thinking only in keywords and start thinking in questions

One of the clearest shifts discussed at the event was the move from keyword optimization to contextual relevance. AI systems are trying to answer layered shopper questions. That means your content has to explain who the product is for, what problem it solves, and how it fits a real use case.

This applies to PDPs, FAQ content, support materials, brand pages, and educational content. If your copy only mirrors a retailer taxonomy, it is probably too thin for where shopping behavior is going.

Slide titled "Stop Thinking Only in Keywords" under the heading "E-Commerce AI Readiness." The slide explains that AI systems answer layered shopper questions and that content must explain who a product is for, what problem it solves, and how it fits real-world use cases. A large feature panel states, "AI visibility now depends on contextual relevance, not just keyword matching." Supporting cards highlight key considerations: identifying the intended shopper or use case, clearly explaining the problem the product solves, showing how the product is used in real scenarios, applying this context across product pages, FAQs, support content, and brand resources, and moving beyond simple taxonomy by providing richer context that AI systems can understand. The design features a black background, colorful blue-green-purple gradient headline, and minimalist line-art icons.

3. Treat brand.com like a performance asset again

This came up repeatedly, and it should get more attention than it does. Brand websites are becoming a key source of truth for AI systems. That creates a real opening for brands that are willing to publish clear, useful, crawlable content on owned properties.

For many brands, that likely means:

  • adding stronger FAQ content
  • tightening product education pages
  • publishing use-case content
  • expanding pages that explain ingredients, claims, comparisons, or category context

If AI agents are scraping your brand site, then your brand site needs to do more than look polished. It needs to answer questions well.

Slide titled "Treat Brand.com Like a Performance Asset Again" under the heading "E-Commerce AI Readiness." The slide explains that brand websites are becoming a key source of truth for AI systems and must do more than look polished—they must answer shopper questions clearly. A highlighted statement reads, "Owned content is now part of your AI discoverability infrastructure." Supporting sections outline what this means for brands, including stronger FAQ content, better product education pages, useful use-case content, and dedicated pages for ingredients, claims, comparisons, and category context. Another section emphasizes a shift from purely aesthetic websites to sites that are clear, useful, crawlable, and designed to answer real shopper questions. On the right, a laptop mockup displays a sample e-commerce website featuring product imagery, FAQs, and key product benefits. The design uses a dark background, colorful gradient headline, and modern UI-style content cards.

4. Build a citation strategy, not just a content strategy

One of the more useful ideas from the conference was the emphasis on citations. AI systems do not rely only on what brands say about themselves. They look at earned media, reviews, forums, listicles, blogs, and other third-party references to validate credibility.

That creates a broader content challenge, but also a bigger opportunity. PR, communications, social, ecommerce, and content teams should not be working in parallel on this. They should be working together.

If your brand has strong product pages but weak third-party validation, that is now a visibility problem.

Slide titled "Build a Citation Strategy, Not Just a Content Strategy" under the heading "E-Commerce AI Readiness." The slide explains that AI systems validate credibility using third-party sources, not just brand-owned content. It highlights that AI models evaluate earned media, reviews, forums, listicles, blogs, and other external references when determining trust and visibility. A featured statement reads, "Strong product pages without third-party validation now create a visibility problem." A central diagram illustrates multiple validation sources connecting to a verified trust signal. Supporting sections explain that citations help AI systems verify credibility beyond brand claims, identify key sources of validation such as earned media and reviews, and emphasize the opportunity for PR, communications, social, ecommerce, and content teams to work together rather than in silos. The design features a dark background, a blue-green-purple gradient headline, and modern icon-based content panels.

5. Put a cross-functional team in place now

This may be the most important operational lesson from the event. The brands that sounded the most prepared were not treating this as an ecommerce-only initiative. They were building task forces and rapid test teams across functions.

That usually means some version of:

  • ecommerce
  • brand
  • PR and communications
  • legal
  • analytics
  • IT or data
  • product or category leads

The reason is simple. The work touches all of them.

Slide titled "Put a Cross-Functional Team in Place Now" under the heading "E-Commerce AI Readiness." The slide emphasizes that AI readiness should not be treated as an ecommerce-only initiative but as a cross-functional business effort. It explains that leading brands are forming task forces and rapid-response teams across departments rather than working in isolated channels. A featured statement reads, "AI readiness is an operating model, not a single-channel project." Supporting content identifies key stakeholders, including ecommerce, brand, PR and communications, legal, analytics, IT or data teams, and product or category leaders. Additional sections explain that AI readiness touches content, claims, governance, measurement, systems, and product context simultaneously, and that leading brands coordinate efforts through collaborative teams rather than siloed workstreams. The design features a dark background, a blue-green-purple gradient headline, and modern card-based layouts with minimalist icons.

6. Measure what is changing, even if your framework is imperfect

The conference did not pretend measurement is solved. It is not. But that is not a reason to wait. Share of voice, AI visibility, rankings, conversion shifts, and content performance all came up as early indicators that brands can track now while better measurement frameworks mature.

A messy but active measurement framework is more useful than perfect reporting that never gets built.

Slide titled "Measure What Is Changing, Even If Your Framework Is Imperfect" under the heading "E-Commerce AI Readiness." The slide argues that brands should begin measuring AI-related performance now, even though industry measurement standards are still evolving. A highlighted statement reads, "Early indicators matter now, even while better measurement frameworks mature." The slide outlines metrics brands can track today, including share of voice, AI visibility, rankings, conversion shifts, and content performance. Additional sections emphasize that agentic commerce rewards readiness rather than novelty, and define readiness as improving data quality, creating more useful content, strengthening citation signals, and increasing collaboration across internal teams. A final section encourages brands to act within the next 90 days, noting that organizations building capabilities now will be better positioned than those waiting for measurement standards and market categories to fully mature. The design uses a dark background, a blue-green-purple gradient headline, and modern card-style content blocks with simple icons.

The real takeaway

The strongest message I took from the event was that agentic commerce is not rewarding novelty first. It is rewarding readiness. The brands best positioned for this shift are the ones that get their data right, make their content more useful, strengthen their citation footprint, and move faster across internal silos.

That is not glamorous work. It is also probably the highest-leverage work on the board right now.

If brands spend the next 90 days doing that well, they will be in a far better position than the ones still waiting for the category to settle before they act.

The AI-First Agency

Win AI search, grow revenue and build reputation through PR and digital marketing.

, ,

More from Avenue Z

Recommended reads

Connect With Us

Stay in touch. Discuss your needs with us and see how we can help.